People seeking to get rid of their tattoos often look to laser removal, an activity that breaks up the pigments associated with the tattoo with a light beam. Tattoo removal consists of several treatments during a period of time, with everyone making the tattoo fainter and fainter.
But new research finds that the lasers found in tattoo removals may be beneficial in treating several other medical issues — such as for example facial acne scars. The analysis, completed during the Laser & Skin Surgery Center of brand new York and published in JAMA Dermatology, involved researchers using a picosecond 755-nm laser (like those utilized for tattoo removal) with a diffractive lens array in treating facial acne scars. There have been 15 women and five men, with a typical chronological age of 44 yrs old, under the study — and all of them had facial acne scars. During a period of time, the patients received 6 treatments.
Dr. Jeremy Brauer, a writer of the research, notes that the experiment’s participants were “satisfied to extremely satisfied” because of the results. Because during the final treatment result had rolled around, the look and texture of the skin had greatly improved. There was clearly a 25 percent to 50 percent global improvement after a month follow-up following the treatments.
Currently, patients with acne scarring use certain kinds of lasers in procedures like Focal Acne Scar Treatment (FAST). FAST involves using a higher intensity CO2 laser. Lasers assist in removing scars because of the power to poke skin pores within the skin, which forces the defense mechanisms to create collagen, which can be the primary structural protein of connective tissues in animals. New collagen then fills and repairs scars. Other procedures involve platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy, which injects platelets through the patient’s blood in their scars. Several other procedures and remedies are available.
However, the authors associated with the new study think that tattoo lasers could be especially helpful since the results “suggest that improvement in scarring with this treatment goes beyond remodeling of collagen,” potentially making better progress. But “additional studies with larger sample sizes, specific scar sub-type stratification, and histologic analyses are needed,” the authors noted.